Page 141 - SEVEN STEPS for COMPREHENDING the EUROPEAN UNION
P. 141

140  /  SEVEN STEPS FOR COMPREHENDING THE EUROPEAN UNION



                   The first cluster for screening and negotiation  would be the
               “Fundamentals”. The progress in this cluster will define the pace of the
               accession talks and progress with regard to negotiating other clusters.
               If successfully negotiated, the “Fundamentals” will be “provisionally
               closed”, meaning that the fundamental chapters will be reviewed
               throughout the whole negotiation process and reflected in annual
               reports – Enlargement Packages of the EU Commission. Once all clusters
               are concluded, the commission will return to “Fundamentals” for the
               final closure of this cluster and the whole accession negotiations.

               The EU “Unexpected” Enlargement and its Prospects

               Currently, the EU is still enlarging. This time, it expands towards the
               Western Balkans, as well as Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia, despite
               the certain skepticism about EU enlargement which has always been a
               leading sentiment in the EU.

                   The  final  document  of  the  Copenhagen  Summit  of  1993,  which
               set the EU membership criteria, also introduced the following clause:
               “The Union’s capacity to absorb new members, while maintaining
               the momentum of European integration, is also an important
               consideration.”  Since then, similar provisions have been regularly
                           102
               introduced in the final documents of almost all of the consecutive
               European Council meetings, including, for instance, the summit
               document of March 25, 2020, in which the EU members agreed that, in
               line with its enlargement, the Union also needs to “develop its capacity
               to integrate new members.”
                                     103
                   It would be fair to say that there were objective internal and
               external reasons behind the above-mentioned skepticism. Probably,
               the skepticism against EU enlargement is one of the main reasons why
               the EU was hesitant to grant the EU membership perspective to Georgia,
               Ukraine and Moldova. Even if the EU’s stance, to a certain extent, may
               look logical, it could, nonetheless, demonstrate more flexibility:

               102  European Council in Copenhagen 21-22 June 1993
                https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21225/72921.pdf
               103  Council of the European Union, Conclusions, 25 March, 2020
                https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7002-2020-INIT/en/pdf
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146